Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pullig, C.
Right arrow Articles by Biswas, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Attitude Basis, Certainty, and Challenge Alignment: A Case of Negative Brand Publicity

Chris Pullig

Baylor University

Richard G. Netemeyer

University of Virginia

Abhijit Biswas

Wayne State University

By integrating research from attitude challenge matching and consumer alignment and judgment revision, the authors explore how firms can position brands to insulate them from negative publicity and how consumers evaluate brands in reaction to such publicity. They introduce an important moderator of brand evaluation revision, prior brand attitude certainty, and propose that when negative publicity matches or "align". with the basis of a brand attitude, certainty in that attitude interacts with the attitude, determining the affect of the negative publicity on brand evaluations. The results of two experiments suggest that prior brand attitudes held with high certainty tend to "insulat". brands, even when negative publicity matches or aligns with the bases of brand attitudes, whereas brand attitudes held with low certainty may exacerbate the effects of negative event publicity. The results also show that multiplex positioning (positioning a brand with both performance and values-based attributes) may insulate brands more effectively from negative publicity.

Key Words: attitudes • brand equity • negative publicity • brand positioning • attitude certainty • challenge alignment

References

  • Aaker, Jennifer, Susan Fournier, and S. Adam Brasel. 2004. "When Good Brands Do Bad".Journal of Consumer Research 31 (June): 1-16.[CrossRef]
  • Abelson, Robert P. 1988. "Conviction".American Psychologist 43 (April): 267-275.[CrossRef]
  • Ahluwalia, Rohini. 2002. "How Prevalent Is the Negativity Effect in Consumer Environments".Journal of Consumer Research29 (September): 270-280.
  • Ahluwalia, Rohini., Robert E. Burnkrant, and H. Rao Unnava. 2001. "Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment".Journal of Marketing Research 38 (May): 203-214.
  • Ahluwalia, Rohini., H. Rao Unnava, and Robert E. Burnkrant. 2001. "The Moderating Role of Commitment on the Spillover Effect of Marketing Communications".Journal of Marketing Research 38 (November): 458-471.[CrossRef]
  • Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Anderson, Norman H. 1981. Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic Press.
  • Berens, Guido, Cees B. M. van Riel, and Gerrit H. van Bruggen. 2005. "Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses: The Moderating Role of Corporate Brand Dominance".Journal of Marketing 69 (July): 35-48.[CrossRef]
  • Brown, Tom J. and Peter A. Dacin. 1997. "The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses".Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 68-84.
  • Dawar, Niraj and Madan M. Pillutla. 2000. "Impact of Product-Harm Crises on Brand Equity: The Moderating Role of Consumer Expectations".Journal of Marketing Research 38 (May): 215-226.[CrossRef]
  • Eagly, Alice H. and Shelly Chaiken. 1995. "Attitude Strength, Attitude Structure, and Resistance to Change". InAttitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, Vol. 4. Eds. Richard E. Petty and Jon A. Krosnick. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 413-432.
  • Edwards, Kari. 1990. "The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Attitude Formations and Change".Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (August): 202-216.[CrossRef]
  • Fabrigar, Leandre R. and Richard E. Petty. 1999. "The Role of Affective and Cognitive Bases of Attitudes in Susceptibility to Affectively and Cognitively Based Persuasion".Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (March): 363-381.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Festinger, Leon. 1954. "A Theory of Social Comparison Processes". Human Relations 7 (July): 117-140.[CrossRef]
  • Greyser, Stephen A. 1995. "Corporate Reputation: Aid to Growth and Shield".Reputation Management January-February:73-74.
  • Gross, Sharon R., Rolf Holtz, and Norman Miller. 1995. "Attitude Certainty". In Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Eds. Richard E. Petty and Jon A. Krosnick. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 215-245.
  • Haugtvedt, Curtis P., Clark Leavitt, and Wendy L. Schneier. 1993. "Cognitive Strength of Established Brands: Memory, Attitudinal, and Structural Approaches". In Brand Equity and Advertising. Eds. David A. Aaker and Alexander L. Biel. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 247-261.
  • Keller, Kevin Lane. 1993. "Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity".Journal of Marketing 57 (January): 1-22.
  • Keller, Kevin Lane. 2003. Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. (2nd ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Keller, Kevin Lane. and David Aaker. 1997. "Managing a Corporate Brand: The Effects of Corporate Images and Corporate Brand Extensions". MSI Working Paper Series. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
  • Mahajan, Vijay, Eitan Muller, and Roger A. Kerin. 1984. "Introduction Strategy for New Products with Positive and Negative Word-of-Mouth".Management Science 30 (December): 1389-1404.
  • Marcus, Alfred A. and Robert S. Goodman. 1991. "Victims and Shareholders: The Dilemmas of Presenting Corporate Policy During a Crisis".Academy of Management Journal 34 (June): 281-305.[CrossRef]
  • Millar, Murray G. and Karen U. Millar. 1990. "Attitude Change as a Function of Attitude Type and Argument Type".Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (August): 217-228.[CrossRef]
  • Muthukrishnan, A. V., Michel T. Pham, and Amitabh Mungale. 1999. "Comparison, Opportunity, and Judgment Revision".Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes 80 (December): 228-251.[CrossRef]
  • Park, C. Whan, Bernard J. Jaworski, and Deborah J. McInnis. 1986. "Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management".Journal of Marketing 50 (October): 135-145.[CrossRef]
  • Petty, Richard E. and Duane T. Wegener. 1998. "Matching Versus Mismatching Attitude Functions: Implications for Scrutiny of Persuasive Messages".Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin24 (March): 227-240.[Abstract]
  • Pham, Michel Tuan and A. V. Muthukrishnan. 2002. "Search and Alignment in Judgment Revision: Implications for Brand Positioning".Journal of Marketing Research 39 (February): 18-30.[CrossRef]
  • Pomerantz, Eva M., Shelly Chaiken, and Rosalind S. Tordesillas. 1995. "Attitude Strength and Resistance Process".Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (September): 408-419.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Shimp, Terry, Eva Hyatt, and David Snyder. 1991. "A Critical Appraisal of Demand Artifacts in Consumer Research".Journal of Consumer Research 18 (December): 273-283.[CrossRef]
  • Shrivastava, Paul and Ian I. Mitroff. 1987. "Strategic Management of Corporate Crises".Columbia Journal of World Business 22 (Spring): 5-12.
  • Volkmann, J. 1934. "The Relation of the Time of Judgment to the Certainty of Judgment".Psychological Bulletin 31:672-673.
  • Wood, Wendy, Nancy Rhodes, and Michael Biek. 1995. "Working Knowledge and Attitude Strength: An Information-Processing Analysis". In Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Eds. Richard E. Petty and Jon A. Krosnick. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 283-313.

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 34, No. 4, 528-542 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0092070306287128


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pullig, C.
Right arrow Articles by Biswas, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?