Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellen, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mohr, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 34, No. 2, 147-157 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0092070305284976

Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs

Pam Scholder Ellen

Georgia State University, pellen{at}gsu.edu

Deborah J. Webb

University of West Georgia, dwebb{at}westga.edu

Lois A. Mohr

Georgia State University

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is often used as a key criterion in gauging corporate reputation. This research examined the influence of consumers’ attributions on corporate outcomes in response to CSR. Researchers and managers have considered consumers’ beliefs about CSR initiatives to be simplistic, serving either economic ends or reflecting sincere social concerns. The results of two studies established that consumers’ attributions were more complex than traditionally viewed, mirroring many of the motives ascribed to companies by managers and researchers. Rather than viewing corporate efforts along a self- or other-centered continuum, consumers differentiated four types of motives: self-centered motives that are strategic and egoistic and other-centered motives that are values driven and stakeholder driven. Consumers responded most positively to CSR efforts they judged as values driven and strategic while responding negatively to efforts perceived as stakeholder driven or egoistic. Attributions were shown to affect purchase intent as well as mediate the structure of an offer.

Key Words: corporate social responsibility • corporate associations • motives • altruism • cause marketing • corporate reputation • commitment • congruency


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing TheoryHome page
M. Salzer-Morling and L. Strannegard
Ain't misbehavin' consumption in a moralized brandscape
Marketing Theory, December 1, 2007; 7(4): 407 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
S. Sen, C. B. Bhattacharya, and D. Korschun
The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, April 1, 2006; 34(2): 158 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]