This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cowley, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Views From Consumers Next in Line: The Fundamental Attribution Error in a Service Setting

University of Sydney

Consumers often have the opportunity to observe the service encounters of other consumers. Previous research indicates that observers tend to attribute the outcome of an event to the disposition of the actor, regardless of the actor’s situational constraints. In most retail service settings, there are at least two actors: a person providing service and a consumer. In an unsuccessful service encounter, who is more likely to be blamed? In Study 1, both allocentric and idiocentric observers spontaneously attribute outcomes to the disposition of the service provider. In Study 2, idiocentric observers do not revise their initial attributions; they always blame the service provider. In contrast, allocentric observers take the service provider’s situational constraints into account except when they believe that they will become outcome dependent on the service provider who has behavioral control. The results reveal that attributions affect observers’ expectations about their own service encounter.

Key Words: attribution • expectations • services • socialinference process • value orientation

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?