Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, S. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparative Evaluation and the Relationship between Quality, Satisfaction, and Repurchase Loyalty

Svein Ottar Olsen

University of Tromsø, Norway

This study evaluates alternative measurement approaches to examining the relationship between perceived quality performance, customer satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty. The authors define and measure the constructs within a relative attitudinal framework and compare these results to a noncomparative or individual evaluation of products. In addition, loyalty is measured and defined as self-reported repurchase behavior instead of purchase intention. The proposed model, with satisfaction as a mediator between quality and repurchase loyalty, was found to be an acceptable representation of the data across four products and for both comparative and noncomparative evaluations. The use of relative attitudes, however, indicated a much stronger relationship between quality, satisfaction, and loyalty than the attitudes toward a product when they are performed as an individual evaluation. With respect to predictive ability, the study findings suggest that quality, satisfaction, and loyalty should be defined and measured within a relative attitudinal framework.

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30, No. 3, 240-249 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0092070302303005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
X. Li and J. F. Petrick
Examining the Antecedents of Brand Loyalty from an Investment Model Perspective
Journal of Travel Research, August 1, 2008; 47(1): 25 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
Xiaoyun Han, R. J. Kwortnik Jr, and Chunxiao Wang
Service Loyalty: An Integrative Model and Examination across Service Contexts
Journal of Service Research, August 1, 2008; 11(1): 22 - 42.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
H. Evanschitzky and M. Wunderlich
An Examination of Moderator Effects in the Four-Stage Loyalty Model
Journal of Service Research, May 1, 2006; 8(4): 330 - 345.
[Abstract] [PDF]