Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steinman, C.
Right arrow Articles by Farley, J. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Beyond Market Orientation: When Customers and Suppliers Disagree

Christine Steinman

Rohit DeshpandÉ

Harvard Business School

John U. Farley

Dartmouth College and China-Europe International Business School, Shanghai

The essence of market orientation is the successful management of a relationship between suppliers and customers. During the past 15 years, a body of scholarship on antecedents and consequences of market orientation has emerged. But what is the appropriate level of market orientation, and what happens when customers and suppliers disagree about the appropriate level of a supplier’s market orientation? To what extent does such disagreement concerning market orientation affect the customer-supplier relationship? Do answers to these questions vary by country? The authors examine these issues using data from a survey of leading Japanese and U.S. business firms and their key customers that employed a unique matched supplier-customer sampling methodology. The authors report several interesting results.

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 28, No. 1, 109-119 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0092070300281010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
C. Nakata and K. Sivakumar
Instituting the Marketing Concept in a Multinational Setting: The Role of National Culture
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, July 1, 2001; 29(3): 255 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
M. K. Brady and J. J. Cronin Jr.
Customer Orientation: Effects on Customer Service Perceptions and Outcome Behaviors
Journal of Service Research, February 1, 2001; 3(3): 241 - 251.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
A. Parasuraman and D. Grewal
Serving Customers and Consumers Effectively in the Twenty-First Century: A Conceptual Framework and Overview
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, January 1, 2000; 28(1): 9 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]