Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Areni, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kiecker, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Point-of-Purchase Displays, Product Organization, and Brand Purchase Likelihoods

Charles S. Areni

University of Sydney

Dale F. Duhan

Texas Tech University

Pamela Kiecker

Virginia Commonwealth University

Can point-of-purchase (POP) displays cause a decrease in sales of the featured brand? In an actual test-market promotion, the use of special POP displays led to a decrease in sales of featured wines from a specific U.S. region. Moreover, sales of regularly shelved wines from competitive regions actually increased. The results of a laboratory experiment supported the explanation that the POP displays essentially reorganized the wines into region categories within the stores, making it easier for consumers to compare alternatives by region. As a result, sales of wines from preferred regions increased and sales of wines from disliked regions decreased relative to when the wines were displayed by variety categories on regular shelf space. Further evidence indicated that reorganizing products by levels of a given attribute influences purchase likelihoods mainly when the attribute is otherwise low rather than high in salience and when brands have normally high rather than low purchase likelihoods.

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 27, No. 4, 428-441 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0092070399274003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Travel ResearchHome page
W. Rewtrakunphaiboon and H. Oppewal
Effects of Package Holiday Information Presentation on Destination Choice
Journal of Travel Research, November 1, 2008; 47(2): 127 - 136.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
K. K. Desai and S. Ratneshwar
Consumer Perceptions of Product Variants Positioned on Atypical Attributes
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, January 1, 2003; 31(1): 22 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]