This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Downs, P. E. Articles by Kerr, J. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Recent Evidence On the Relationship Between Anonymity and Response Variables for Mail Surveys

Florida State University

John R. Kerr

Florida State University

Although most marketing researchers and texts recom mend guaranteeing respondents anonymity in mail surveys, empirical evidence on this issue is dated, and often is based on results from student or occupational samples. The present study examines the impact of anonymity on item omission, response bias, and response quality. Based on a represent ative sample of respondents from a Southern SMSA, it was found that lack of anonymity had minor effects on response variables. Anonymous respondents provided slightly less in formation to complex questions, and lower-income respond ents, nonwhites, and homeowners were more likely to identify themselves on the return envelope. Yet, the responses of these groups did not differ substantively from answers of other respondents on the range of questionnaire items examined.

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 14, No. 1, 72-82 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/009207038601400110


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Albaum Do Source and Anonymity Affect Mail Survey Results? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, September 1, 1987; 15(3): 74 - 81. [Abstract]